Vaikora › Compare › Vaikora vs Capsule Security

Vaikora vs Capsule Security

Two open-source enforcement engines; the difference is audit-grade compliance at the commercial tier.

Both Vaikora and Capsule Security's ClawGuard ship MIT-licensed open-source enforcement engines with a paid tier. The differentiation is at the commercial tier: Vaikora adds a SHA-256 audit chain, pre-built SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 presets, and AWS Marketplace plus Azure Sentinel distribution. ClawGuard's strengths are developer experience and community footprint.

At a glance

Capability	Vaikora	Capsule Security ClawGuard
Open-source enforcement engine	MIT-licensed gateway	Open-source ClawGuard
Quantified latency	Sub-500ms p95	Not published
Cryptographic audit chain	SHA-256, append-only	Not specified
Compliance presets	SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001	Inherits commercial-tier scope
Marketplace distribution	AWS Marketplace + Azure Sentinel	Direct procurement
Commercial tier	Vaikora Control Plane	ClawGuard commercial
Free tier	MIT gateway free forever	Open-source ClawGuard
Vendor SLA	Yes (commercial)	Yes (commercial)
Multi-language SDK	Python, Node.js	Per ClawGuard docs

How they compare

Two open-source enforcement engines

Both Vaikora and Capsule Security's ClawGuard ship MIT-licensed open-source AI agent enforcement engines with a paid commercial tier. They land in the same category. The differentiation is at the commercial tier, not the open-source core.

Audit chain and compliance presets

Vaikora's commercial tier adds a SHA-256 append-only audit chain and pre-built SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 presets. ClawGuard's commercial tier does not document a cryptographic chain or named presets; its strengths are developer experience and community footprint.

Latency and SLA

Vaikora documents a sub-500ms p95 and a vendor SLA on the commercial tier. ClawGuard does not publish a latency SLA. Both ship a free open-source engine and a paid tier.

Distribution and procurement

Vaikora distributes through AWS Marketplace, Azure Sentinel, and the Anthropic MCP registry. ClawGuard is procured directly. Regulated buyers who want marketplace procurement and named compliance scope choose Vaikora.

Who each is best for

Choose Vaikora when

Audit-grade SHA-256 receipts are a hard requirement.
Pre-built SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, or ISO 27001 presets are needed out of the box.
AWS Marketplace or Azure Sentinel procurement is preferred.
A regulated buyer needs a vendor SLA with documented compliance scope.

Choose Capsule Security when

ClawGuard is already in production and the operational pattern works.
Direct procurement, not a marketplace, is the preferred path.
The compliance focus is outside Vaikora's preset scope.
ClawGuard's developer experience and community ecosystem are the priority.

See Vaikora enforce policy on your stack

Open-core AI runtime control. Self-host the MIT gateway free, or run the hosted Control Plane.

Get a demo Self-host the gateway

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Vaikora and Capsule Security ClawGuard?

Both are MIT-licensed open-source enforcement engines with a paid tier. Vaikora's commercial tier adds a SHA-256 audit chain, five named compliance presets, and AWS Marketplace plus Azure Sentinel distribution. ClawGuard's strengths are developer experience and community footprint.

Are both free to start?

Yes. Both ship a free open-source engine. Vaikora's paid Control Plane adds the audit chain, compliance presets, and SLA.

Which has stronger compliance coverage?

Vaikora ships SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 presets out of the box. ClawGuard's compliance scope is per its commercial tier and is not documented as named presets.

Which should a regulated buyer choose?

Vaikora, when audit-grade SHA-256 receipts, named compliance presets, and marketplace procurement are requirements.