Vaikora › Compare › Vaikora vs Cisco Agent Runtime SDK
Vaikora vs Cisco Agent Runtime SDK
An operator-facing drop-in proxy vs a developer SDK you build into agent code.
At a glance
| Capability | Vaikora | Cisco Agent Runtime SDK |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Inline proxy or 2-line SDK | Developer SDK in agent code |
| Buyer role | Security operator / SOC | Application developer |
| Quantified latency | Sub-500ms p95 | Not published |
| Cryptographic audit chain | SHA-256, append-only | Not specified |
| Open-source reference | Yes, MIT gateway | Cisco-managed |
| Platform dependency | None, standalone | Most natural with Cisco Security Cloud |
| Compliance presets | SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001 | Inherits Cisco posture |
| Marketplace distribution | AWS Marketplace + Azure Sentinel | Via Cisco distribution |
| Pricing | Free OSS + quote-based control plane | Quote-based, Cisco platform context |
How they compare
Operator-facing proxy vs developer SDK
Cisco's Agent Runtime is a developer SDK: developers integrate it into agent code to add identity, policy, and runtime controls at the application level. Vaikora is operator-facing: it sits inline as a proxy or a 2-line SDK at the LLM-call boundary and needs no change to agent code. Cisco puts enforcement in the application; Vaikora puts it in the path.
Latency, audit, and open source
Vaikora documents a sub-500ms p95 and an append-only SHA-256 chain, with an MIT-licensed gateway. Cisco's SDK does not publish a latency number or a cryptographic-chain guarantee and is Cisco-managed rather than open source.
Platform dependency
Cisco's Agent Runtime is most natural inside Cisco Security Cloud. Vaikora has no platform dependency and runs standalone in front of any agent stack.
Compliance presets and procurement
Vaikora ships named SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and ISO 27001 presets and procures through AWS Marketplace and Azure Sentinel. Cisco inherits its compliance posture from the broader Cisco platform and procures through Cisco distribution.
Who each is best for
Choose Vaikora when
- Enforcement is needed without modifying agent code.
- The deployment model is proxy-inline or a 2-line SDK at the boundary, not application-embedded.
- Audit-grade SHA-256 receipts are required.
- The organization is not standardized on Cisco Security Cloud.
Choose Cisco Agent Runtime SDK when
- The organization is standardized on Cisco Security Cloud.
- The development team owns the agent code and wants application-level enforcement primitives.
- A vendor-managed SDK in the developer toolchain matches existing practice.
- Cisco platform procurement is the natural path.
See Vaikora enforce policy on your stack
Open-core AI runtime control. Self-host the MIT gateway free, or run the hosted Control Plane.
Get a demo Self-host the gatewayFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between Vaikora and Cisco Agent Runtime SDK?
Cisco's Agent Runtime is a developer SDK you build into agent code. Vaikora is an operator-facing proxy or 2-line SDK that enforces at the LLM-call boundary with no code changes, with a sub-500ms p95 and a SHA-256 audit chain.
Do I need to change my agent code for Vaikora?
No. Vaikora runs inline as a proxy or drops in with a 2-line SDK. The Cisco SDK is integrated into the agent application by developers.
Do I need Cisco to run Vaikora?
No. Vaikora is platform-independent. Cisco's Agent Runtime is most natural inside Cisco Security Cloud.
Is Vaikora open source?
Yes. The Vaikora gateway is MIT-licensed and free forever. The Cisco SDK is Cisco-managed.
Vaikora